Monday, October 30, 2017

Basic Economy Is a Success

Basic Economy Is a Success for Airlines, Even If Travelers Don't Buy the Tickets

basic economy seating airplane passengers airline flight
Getty Images

CAILEY RIZZO 

Airlines are unlikely to get rid of basic economy fares any time soon. And they don’t even care if nobody buys the no-frills tickets.

Basic economy is “more of a defensive product than it is an offensive product, because we need to have a product for people who are just price conscious,” Delta Air Lines president Glen Hauenstein told reporters last week, according to Air Transport World. “Our sell-up [from basic economy] continues to remain high and I think that’s the key part.”

In other words: traditional airlines only created basic economy as an option for people who generally fly on budget airlines. It was never meant to provide a price break for its average customer base. In fact, airlines gauge their success on how many people choose not to buy basic economy tickets.

The trend has only continued to grow over the past few years. Delta was the first legacy airline to offer this airfare category, introducing basic economy back in 2015. And in February of this year, United and American Airlines jumped onboard.

Even if, as a collective flying society, travelers decided never again to buy a basic economy ticket, airlines would be unlikely to eliminate the option.

Airlines make billions off the tricky venture (possibly $3.1 billion by next year). In addition to retaining customers who would have otherwise been poached by budget carriers, airlines often profit from travelers who don't fully understand the limitations of a basic economy ticket. Hauenstein noted that these customers often end up paying more to upgrade their trip (fees for checked baggage, for food, and for seat selections, among others).

The best defense against overpaying for lower class service is to read up on the specific policies for individual airlines. Those traveling with extra luggage will likely find that a general economy ticket is the cheaper option.

Tax Cuts

White House economist: Middle class will benefit from business tax cuts in 3 to 5 years

 By Rick Newman

A recent study from the White House claims that slashing the corporate tax rate would boost middle class incomes by somewhere at least $4,000 per year. But there’s a catch: it would take a while.

“This is the disappointing answer in terms of timing,” Kevin Hassett, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said at the Yahoo Finance All-Markets Summit on October 25. “If you go to the optimistic side of the literature, it could take 3 to 5 years. If you go to the pessimistic side, it would about double that.”

Hasset’s paper makes a fairly intuitive argument: Lowering the corporate tax rate from 35%, the current rate, to 20%, which is President Trump’s target, would lure more businesses to America, generate more economic activity, and increase demand for workers, which would push wages up. But the paper doesn’t say how long it might take for this process to play out, which is what Hassett elaborated on at the Yahoo Finance summit.

“Firms are going to say, ‘Oh geez, we should go to the United States and locate our plants here,’ ” Hassett told Yahoo Finance. “But it takes a while for the machines to get nailed down and plugged in, the jobs to be listed online, people to apply and so on. That process takes a little bit of time.”

Hassett’s paper has drawn criticism from prominent economists such as Larry Summers and Jason Furman, who both worked in the Obama administration. But economists who have worked in Republican administrations support it, including Greg Mankiw and Casey Mulligan. The new caveat about the lag between tax cuts on businesses and benefits enjoyed by middle-class workers may actually improve the credibility of the CEA analysis, since it acknowledges that corporate tax cuts are not a magic formula that would push incomes up overnight.

But it’s politically problematic, because corporations would enjoy lower taxes and higher profits right away, while ordinary workers waited for the benefits to reach them. Hassett’s best-case scenario—a three-year lag—would span at least two election cycles. If corporate tax cuts went into effect in 2018, ordinary folks wouldn’t benefit until at least 2021. Republicans, meanwhile, would have to campaign for the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential election by promising that the tax relief already enjoyed by businesses will soon reach regular families.

Individual tax rates

Cutting individual tax rates could offer a different form of relief for middle- and lower-income families, one they feel much sooner. During a different session at the Yahoo Finance summit, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum and former director of the Congressional Budget Office, predicted that the tax reform bill Congress eventually passes will go into effect as of January 1, 2018 (even if it must be retroactive) and push rates down for most taxpayers right away. That means the amount of tax withheld from paychecks would go down and take-home pay would go up—well before voters hit the polls next November.

Still, many economists argue that it’s the business tax code, rather than the individual side, that is in most need of repair. That’s because the US corporate rate of 35% is the highest among advanced economies, yet tax breaks and loopholes push the actual tax paid far lower than 35%. For most companies, the CEA paper is an attempt to link cuts in the corporate rate to the well-being of ordinary Americans. Expect the debate over that to intensify.

Experimental Magnetic Propulsion System

Chinese Navy Tests Experimental Magnetic Propulsion System

You know, like in The Hunt for Red October. Kinda.


Getty
 
By Kyle Mizokami

Engineers and scientists in China have started up the first Chinese ship with a magnetohydrodynamic propulsion system. The system, which uses magnetic fields propel a ship through the water, promises to make quieter military submarines that are harder to detect. However, the technology is not new and has failed to catch on in the mainstream.

The report in China's official military news site and mentioned by China Defense Blog, says that a ship with a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) propulsion system or "rim-driven pumpjet" drive was tested in southern China, on Hainan island. The ship, docked at the Chinese naval base at Sanya, was tested on October 18th and "then reached the designated speed."


The Hunt for Red October.
Getty Images.

MHD propulsion systems work by using superconducting magnets to create strong magnetic fields. Generated by electric motors, these fields move seawater through an underwater shaft and past a metal rim, propelling the ship forward. MHD propulsion uses no moving parts, making it ultra-quiet. The fictional Soviet Navy submarine Red October in the film The Hunt for Red October used a MHD drive. In the movie, the Red October was described as particularly dangerous because its quietness made it easier to sneak up on the East Coast and launch a so-called nuclear "decapitation strike" against the United States.

MHD propulsion research was popular in the West and Japan in the late 1980s. The most famous MHD-driven ship, the Japanese Yamato-1, was tested briefly in 1992 and achieved a top speed of eight knots. Despite early signs of promise MHD propulsion research never led to the technology becoming operational on submarines. It's unclear why that's the case, but one reason might be the difficulty in generating sufficiently powerful electromagnetic fields to propel ships and submarines at useful speeds. Here's a classroom example of a MHD drive:

The Chinese test leaves several unanswered questions. The article specifically mentions using the technology on submarines, but it's not clear if the test ship was a submarine or surface vessel. The ship speed is not mentioned, only that it reached a "designated speed", which implies that it was actually pretty slow. If the ship was fast, the Chinese government would have been the first to say so.

If China can get MHD propulsion to work it will prove a valuable workaround to one of China's most difficult submarine technology hurdles: the inability to make very quiet propellers. MHD propulsion has no propellers at all. While there are other hurdles, including reducing machinery and reactor noise, China is clearly on a full court press to catch up to—and perhaps even exceed—U.S. and Western submarine technology.

Riddle of the Week

Riddle of the Week: A Shipment of Apples to Bananaville

Difficulty level: Hard


Michael Stillwell
 
By Jay Bennett

Welcome back. This week we try to help the fictional town of Bananaville, which, despite its predilection for the yellow fruit, is eagerly awaiting a shipment of delicious apples.

PROBLEM

You are tasked with transporting 3,000 apples from Appleland to Bananaville, a distance of 1,000 miles. You have a truck that holds 1,000 apples. However, there is an apple toll on the road to Bananaville, and you must pay 1 apple per mile you drive. There is no toll when you are headed in the opposite direction, toward Appleland.

What is the largest number of apples you can transport to Bananaville?

HINT

You may leave apples on the side of the road and return to pick them up later.

SOLUTION

Once you bring as many apples as you possibly can to the potassium-enriched citizens of Bananaville, you can see the solution on Friday.

Weekend Box Office Results

'Jigsaw' Tops Weekend, 'Suburbicon' Flops & 'Thor 3' Hauls in $100M+ International Debut

by Brad Brevet




Lionsgate's Jigsaw came in just a bit behind expectations, which some may attribute to the Netflix debut of the second season of "Stranger Things" on Friday or the seven year gap between films, but that isn't to say this is a poor debut. Elsewhere, however, Paramount's Suburbicon flopped while Universal's release of Thank You for Your Service didn't perform much better over the course of one of the worst weekends of the year so far, with the top twelve currently sitting below a combined $60 million, $18 million behind the same weekend last year.

With an estimated $16.25 million, Lionsgate's Jigsaw brought the Saw franchise back to the big screen after a seven year hiatus and delivered the seventh best opening of the franchise's eight films. Only 2009's Saw VIdebuted lower, but that isn't to say this is a terrible opening. Given the film's reasonable, $10 million budget, this opening just shows this franchise isn't delivering the same kind of numbers it did in the early aughts.

The first Saw not only introduced the world to James Wan, but debuted with $18.2 million domestically and delivered over $103 million worldwide, leading to a franchise that will top $900 million globally by tomorrow.

That being said, Jigsaw's staying power within the current marketplace (not to mention just how much of an effect "Stranger Things" had on its opening) will be tested next weekend as it would be relatively safe to expect a 60%+ drop next weekend and perhaps a less than 2x multiplier for the film's domestic run. Opening day audiences gave the film a "B" CinemaScore, which is mostly on par for the franchise, and of that audience 51% were female and 52% were under the age of 25.

Internationally, Jigsaw opened in 46 markets with an estimated $9.5 million. Of those 46, only three were major markets with the UK leading the way with an estimated $2.3 million for a second place finish along with a $1.7 million debut in Russia and $1.4 million opening in Germany. The film will debut in Italy, France, Belgium, Australia and South Korea this coming week.

Lionsgate also finished in second position with Tyler Perry's Boo 2! A Madea Halloween brought in an estimated $10 million, pushing the film's domestic cume over $35 million after ten days in release. While that matches Mojo's forecast, it puts the sequel's performance well behind the first film, which had already grossed $52.5 million after ten days, see the full, head-to-head comparison here.

Warner's Geostorm finished in third place with an estimated $5.67 million as the film's domestic cume now stands at $23.5 million after ten days in release. The film's international performance, however, offers a little more to boast about. The disaster pic debuted in China this weekend with an estimated $34.1 million, which contributed to an overall $49.3 million weekend overseas, bringing the international cume to $113.4 million for a global tally over $136 million.

Universal and Blumhouse's Happy Death Day brought in an estimated $5 million for a fourth place finish as its domestic cume now stands at $48.3 million as it enters its third weekend in release.

Rounding out the top five is WB's Blade Runner 2049 with an estimated $3.9 million as the film's domestic cume climbs to $81.3 million. Additionally, Blade Runner debuted in China this weekend and struggled, delivering a mere $7.6 million and a third place finish. The film also opened in Japan with an estimated $2.7 million and a #1 finish as its international cume currently stands at $142 million based on weekend estimates.

Just outside the top five we come to the second of the weekend's new wide releases in Universal's release of Amblin and DreamWorks's Thank You for Your Service. The film opened with just $3.7 million, which is just a bit shy of Mojo's meager $4 million forecast. While reviews were solid (68 rating on Metacritic) and opening day audiences liked what they saw ("A-" CinemaScore), there just wasn't enough interest. Overall, the audience was 58% male vs. 42% female with 70% coming in over the age of 25.

Further down the list, it isn't until ninth position that we find George Clooney's Suburbicon, which brought in just $2.8 million from 2,046 theaters for a $1,369 per theater average. Reviews heading into the weekend weren't very strong as it currently holds a 43 rating on Metacritic and audiences weren't impressed either. The film received a rare "D-" CinemaScore and performed worst with its largest audience, receiving an "F" from moviegoers over the age of 50, which made up 54% of the weekend's ticket buyers.

In limited release, Open Road's All I See is You brought in an estimated $135,504 from 283 theaters ($479 PTA); Magnolia's The Square delivered a solid $76,000 from two locations; Sony Classics' release of Novitiatebrought in $22,577 from three theaters ($7,526 PTA), PBS's Bill Nye: Science Guy documentary brought in $9,150 from one theater; FilmBuff's Mansfield 66/67 opened with $6,602 from one theater; and The Orchard's The Work debuted with $3,178 from two locations.

Near the bottom of the chart is Dimension's release of Amityville: The Awakening, which the studio released into just ten theaters for just one showtime on Saturday evening, resulting in just $742.

In international news, Disney and Marvel's release of Thor: Ragnarok into 36 material markets this weekend delivered an estimated $107.6 million. Disney reports the opening is +4% ahead of Guardians of the Galaxy 2 and +22% ahead of Doctor Strange when comparing the same suite of territories at today's exchange rates. The release accounts for ~52% of the international marketplace and was led by the UK with an estimated $15.8mfollowed by South Korea ($15.5m), Australia ($8.4m), Brazil ($8.3m), France ($7.4m), Indonesia ($5.5m), Taiwan ($5.4m), Italy ($4.2m), Philippines ($3.8m), Malaysia ($3.5m), Spain ($3.4m), Hong Kong ($2.9m), Singapore ($2.2m) and Argentina ($2.0m).

Thor: Ragnarok releases in ~3,800 North American theaters next weekend along with debuts in Germany, Russia, China, Japan, Mexico, Austria and several others, accounting for nearly 100% of the global marketplace.
Additionally, Disney and Pixar's Coco began its international release this weekend, opening in Mexico ahead of the Día de Muertos holiday next week. The film brought in an estimated $8.4 million over the weekend and will make its debut in North America on November 23 followed by a full international roll out beginning in Russia on November 22 and running through mid-March 2018 when it will open in Japan.

Getting back to the domestic marketplace really quickly, next week will not only see Thor opening on Friday, but STX will release A Bad Moms Christmas into 3,500+ theaters on Wednesday. Early industry expectations are for a $20-25 million debut over the film's first five days in release.

October 27-29, 2017
Weekend
TWLWTitle (click to view)StudioWeekend Gross% ChangeTheater Count / ChangeAverageTotal GrossBudget*Week #
1NJigsawLGF$16,250,000-2,941-$5,525$16,250,000$101
21Tyler Perry's Boo 2! A Madea HalloweenLGF$10,000,000-52.9%2,388-$4,188$35,521,643$252
32GeostormWB$5,675,000-58.6%3,246-$1,748$23,553,368$1202
43Happy Death DayUni.$5,099,000-45.5%3,535+237$1,442$48,393,525$4.83
54Blade Runner 2049WB$3,965,000-46.1%2,421-782$1,638$81,385,785$1504
6NThank You for Your Service (2017)Uni.$3,702,000-2,054-$1,802$3,702,000$201
75Only The BraveSony$3,450,000-42.5%2,577-$1,339$11,940,057$382
86The ForeignerSTX$3,210,000-44.5%2,505-10$1,281$28,827,318$353
9NSuburbiconPar.$2,800,000-2,046-$1,369$2,800,000-1
107ItWB (NL)$2,465,000-28.6%2,560-$963$323,730,202$358

A Crown without Jewels

A Crown without Jewels

A Crown without Jewels
by Ryan Duncan, Crosswalk.com Editor
Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.– Hebrews 4:16 
Like most kids who grew up in the church, I was enrolled in Awana the moment I had the ability to memorize John 3:16. Not that I’m complaining, I enjoyed the evenings of games and Bible stories. However, like every Bible club for small children, Awana had its share of speed bumps. One such bump appeared during a lesson where a young woman was sharing her testimony. She had just finished telling everyone the story of how her grandfather accepted Christ on his deathbed when a hand shot up in the back of the audience.
"Does this mean we can do whatever we want as long as we say sorry before we die?" asked the child. I can vaguely remember the look of panic that came into the woman's eyes when she discovered her class was trying to cheat the system. Torn between theology and a group of minors, she opted for the easiest answer.
"Well, yes, God will forgive you if you ask him," then reaching down to her jacket, she pulled out the tiny crown pin reserved only for the best children in the club, "but it also means you will have fewer jewels in your crown when you get to heaven." I'm not bothered that our leader chose to use this explanation; it's hard to describe the grace of God to a room full of third graders hopped up on gummy bears. What does bother me is the number of adult Christians who still believe this idea to be true.
“I grew up in a Christian household.”
“I accepted Christ when I was only seven.”  
Many Christians will take these statements and present them as proof of their superiority. Proof that the person who just gave their life to Christ is somehow "Second Class." Thankfully, Jesus didn't see it that way, and said as much in the parable of the vineyard
"So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius. When they received it, they began to grumble against the landowner. 'These men who were hired last worked only one hour,' they said, 'and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.' But he answered one of them, 'Friend, I am not being unfair to you. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius? Take your pay and go. I want to give the man who was hired last the same as I gave you. Don't I have the right to do what I want with my own money? Or are you envious because I am generous?' So the last will be first, and the first will be last." – Matthew 20:10-16
It does not matter if you spend your entire life ignoring God or trying to build a stairway to heaven, we have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of Christ. But when we accept him as our savior that all changes, regardless of how old we are or how we’ve spent our past. The whole, wonderful point of grace is that it cannot be earned. How else could it be called grace?
Intersecting Faith and Life: Remember to be humble and show understanding to others. We are all on a journey to know God, so love others as he would love them.
Further Reading

A Journey of Lifelong Learning

A Journey of Lifelong Learning Starts with This Choice

A Journey of Lifelong Learning Starts with This Choice
By Rick Warren
“Commit yourself to instruction; listen carefully to words of knowledge” (Proverbs 23:12 NLT).
Your journey of lifelong learning starts with a choice. It’s a choice only you can make. It’s an incredibly important decision that’ll impact your entire life.
The Bible says, “Commit yourself to instruction; listen carefully to words of knowledge” (Proverbs 23:12 NLT).
I made this commitment to keep learning when I was 15 years old. I began saying that I would learn as much as I could. For many years I read at least a book a day. I started collecting books as a teenager, and I have more than 35,000 volumes in my library now. Books open the door to every subject imaginable.
Your education doesn’t stop when you graduate. I’ve actually heard people say, “I’m glad I’ve finished my education so now I can start my career.” Tell that one to God, and he’ll laugh. God has so much more he wants to teach you! Your education should never end.
Learning isn’t a stage of life; it is your life! God wants you to learn something new every day. So don’t stop — ever!
Start working on learning a new skill this year. God wants you to grow. You should be and can be different — better — a year from now than you are today.
It’s in your best interest to do so. Lifelong learning will make you a better leader, a better parent, a better spouse, a better friend. It’ll make you more effective in your job. It brings both success and profit.
The Bible says, “If the ax is dull and its edge unsharpened, more strength is needed, but skill will bring success” (Ecclesiastes 10:10 NIV).
If you’ve got an ax with a dull blade and you’re chopping wood, it’ll take a lot more energy to do it. If your ax is sharp (which represents skill in this verse), then it doesn’t take as much effort.
The Bible is saying to work smarter, not harder. You’re never wasting time when you’re sharpening your ax.

Mon Inspiration

Morning Inspiration with Pastor Merritt

Followers of Jesus make followers of Jesus. Jesus showed us while on earth what a real relationship with God looks like, and invites us to have one ourselves.

We cannot take people where they need to go (to Jesus) until we connect with them where they are. Connecting to others is following Jesus' example in Scripture.

1. We need to proactively connect with people.

"Jesus went through all the towns and villages, teaching in their synagogues, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom and healing every disease and sickness." Matthew 9:35

Jesus took the initiative to go where people were. He did not want people to have to find Him. He found them. In your life, do you go out of your way to build relationships with others? Do you look at each interaction with someone new as an opportunity to build a friendship? Do you value friendships and your relationships with others above other possessions in life?

2. We need to passionately care for people.

"When he saw the crowds, he had compassion on them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd." Matthew 9:36

Do we see people the way Jesus saw people? When we see people we don't know, are we often moved to avoid them, or like Jesus, are we moved to have compassion on them. Do you look at people simple for what they can do for you, or for how you can serve them? Do you see their hearts, their hurts and their needs?

3. We need to personally commit to people.

"Then he said to his disciples, 'The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field.'" Matthew 9:37-38

Jesus asked His disciples to pray for more disciples to connect with people. Why prayer? Because when the disciples prayed, God opened their hearts to know more people, to have compassion for them and to look into their spiritual needs. When we begin to pray for workers, God begins with us, making us more effective, and brings others into our lives that we can teach and train to impact the lives of people as well.

This week, think about your own commitment to see to the spiritual needs of people you know. When you meet someone, always be looking for a way to connect with them. Ask God to make you sensitive to the spiritual needs of people, and to give you compassion for others. When you pray, ask God to build up more disciples through you, so that you can not only influence others toward Christ, but communicate the importance of a compassionate life as well.

Sunday, October 29, 2017

Make Video Chats Look Better


How to Make Video Chats Look Better with Your Computer’s Night Mode


I hate video chats. As a tool for a work-from-home writer, it’s obviously pretty essential, but between my pale complexion and a desk full of computer monitors, the picture streaming through my webcam makes me look like the least attractive extra in an Anne Rice movie.
This is because monitors and laptop screens are optimized for showing black text on a white background, so they tend to give a washed-out, blue-ish tone to people with pale skin.
But there’s a new feature on both Windows and macOS that can deal with this, making a tanless wonder like me look more like a human being and less like a creature of the night. It’s also easy to turn on and off as needed. Here’s an example of how you can use it.
First, let’s look at my desk area. My workstation is perhaps an extreme example, with three monitors working against a corner of the room that’s away from the windows and doors. Even so, with a full fan light and a backlight behind those monitors, it’s constantly blasting white-blue light on my face.
Combine that with my pale skin and the way all of my lamps in the room are behind my back and head, and you get a webcam view that looks like this:



A full triple-wide screenshot showing my washed-out mug.
My face, direct from camera output on the same screenshot. Notice the light from the monitors, and how the room’s light (behind me) can’t affect it.

It looks a little better without my side monitors on, and even better when I use them with a warm background to cast a more even tone on my face…but then I can’t use those monitors for displaying information during the meeting, or taking down notes while I watch the other video conference participants on my center screen. It defeats the purpose of my fancy multitasking setup.
Now, I’m going to open up the same nearly all-white windows I had before, but use the Windows 10 feature, Night Light,to create warmer tones across all three monitors.
Night Light is a function meant to reduce the use of blue LED light from computer monitors and laptop screens. Research suggests that toning down blue and white light when you’re close to sleeping (or already should be) might help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep. It’s designed to work automatically, but for this example, we’re going to take full control of it and use a dramatic red-orange shift on the monitors to tone down the light that makes me look like Edmond Dantès in his Château D’If years.
To access Night Light, just click the Windows button and start typing “Night Light,” then click the first result. From the “Display” window, click “Night light settings” beneath the Color option.
I’ve set the color shift to more than halfway into the red/orange spectrum, making my monitors distinctly orange. This is much more of a shift than I normally use, but it’s still easy to read and take notes.
(If you’re on macOS, the Night Light feature is called Night Shift. You can access it by opening the System Preferences icon in your dock, then “Displays,” then click the Night Shift option. The orange filter meter goes in the opposite direction, but it’s more or less the same thing. Check out this How-To Geek article on how to enable it on a regular schedule.)
Now with all three monitors using the same windows as before, you can see that my skin tone is more natural and less washed-out. I’ve basically used my monitors themselves as natural photo lights with a warming filter.
The results look much more true to life appealing. Well, appealing as my face ever looks, anyway. The lighting conditions in the rest of the room are pretty much the same as above, but directly in front of the camera is a warmer tone that doesn’t wash out my skin.
Note that the orange overlay will affect your face because of the light coming from the monitors, but it won’t apply an extra orange effect to the image going from the camera to your web conference—that’s only visible to you. Once you’re done with the conference, just set the Night Light filter back to its normal level, or turn it off completely if you weren’t using it before.
If you don’t have an updated version of Windows 10 or macOS, you can use manual color controls on your monitor to achieve pretty much the same effect, but it’s much more difficult to adjust and turn on or off. A better alternative is F.lux, a third-party app that does pretty much the same thing with a full screen blue/orange reading filter. It’s available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, for free.

'Black Dahlia' Murder

Author Claims to Solve Notorious 'Black Dahlia' Murder
Killer was a sadistic accused pimp, says Piu Eatwell
By Arden Dier,  Newser Staff




Shrink


This photo shows Elizabeth Short, dubbed the Black Dahlia.   (Wikimedia)

(NEWSER) – It wasn't a doctor who tortured, killed, and carved a clown-like smile in the face of the Black Dahlia, but an accused pimp who escaped punishment as part of a police cover-up, according to a new book. After three years of scouring official documents and grand jury files, British author Piu Eatwell puts forth a new theory that aspiring actress Elizabeth Short was killed in 1947 by a man with links to organized crime who threatened to expose other Los Angeles murders if police arrested him, reports Opposing Views. According to Eatwell's Black Dahlia, Red Rose, Short had a falling out with Danish businessman and nightclub owner Mark Hansen, who then used his mob connections to ask accused pimp Leslie Dillon to get rid of her, reports the Sun.
Hansen, one of several suspects in Short's murder, may not have realized that Dillon was a sadistic psychopath who would use his experience as a mortician's assistant to torture and kill Short before cutting her body in two and draining it of blood, Eatwell writes. She believes the murder took place at the Aster Motel, whose owner hid a blood-stained room and a bundle of bloodied clothes found on the same day as Short's body for fear he'd become a suspect. Eatwell says police later questioned Dillon, who knew details of the murder even police did not, per People. But he was never arrested because he threatened to embarrass police by exposing the extent of organized crime in LA, says Eatwell, adding she's "confident" she's solved the case.

Germ-Covered Surfaces

We Found the Most Germ-Covered Surfaces in New York City

Our editor-in-chief used a handheld germ counter to make some very gross discoveries


BY MONICA ANDRADE
the grossest places in NYC

If you don't want to scrub your entire body clean after walking around a major American city, well, maybe you should.

In an episode of Gross from Men's Health, editor-in-chief Matt Bean used a handheld germ counter to swab a number of surfaces in New York City, including a Starbucks door handle, a taxicab handle, a door knob at Grand Central Terminal, and a city-sponsored Internet kiosk. The device ranks how germy the surface of an item is, depending on the bacteria and biological material it finds. The lower the rating, the fewer germs it has. If something gets a rating of 50, it shouldn’t touch your food.

So what did Bean find? Germs. Lots of them.

The title for the grossest public object in New York City goes to Citi Bikes. Turns out, the handlebars on these communal bikes are less hygienic than the hold bars on subway trains—45 times germier to be exact.

“These things are consistently among the most disgusting surfaces that we’ve tested in all of New York City,” Men’s Health editor-in-chief Matt Bean says.

Here are the results for the other objects Bean tested:

1. Citi Bike handlebar - 1,512

2. Starbucks door handle - 1,090

3. LinkNYC kiosk - 807

4. Taxi handle - 424

5. Grand Central door knob - 45

6. Subway hold bars - 35

While the vast majority of bacteria is harmless, it’s important to regularly wash your hands—even if you're not a germaphobe. You touch hundreds of potentially germ-infested items every day—even your own household items, like your laptop. (Here's our guide to getting rid of germs in your house.) Bean says the real germ bomb you have to worry about are your towels.

"The thick nature of bath towels helps them trap moisture and dead skin cells," he says, recommending you clean your bath towel every three uses.

Best Chat Feature


Voice Messaging Is the Best Chat Feature You’re Probably Not Using


Text messaging sucks. If you think about it, it’s a pretty inefficient way to communicate. It’s slow, lacks nuance, and it’s easy to make mistakes. Smartphones with huge touch screens have a lot going for them, but making texting easy isn’t one of them.
Thankfully though, there are other options. Most major messaging apps—including iMessage, WhatsApp, and Facebook Chat—have other ways for you to communicate: you can send emoji, photos, videos, and—most importantly for me—voice messages, which have some serious advantages over pure text messages.
Voice messaging is quicker. Typing texts on a touch screen is slow and awkward, it’s easy to make mistakes (which you have to go back and correct), and you have to look directly at the screen the whole time. Even if you’re a really quick texter who rarely makes mistakes, it’s still likely to be slower than the speed at which you talk.
Voice messaging can be done one-handed, which means you can do it pretty much anywhere. Even “normal” sized modern smartphone like the regular iPhone 8 or the Google Pixel have huge screens. I haven’t been able to properly use a smartphone with one hand since the iPhone 5S, let alone text properly on one. With voice messaging you just have to hold down a single conveniently placed button and talk. No awkwardly balancing your phone on your fingers required.
Voice messages avoid more misunderstandings. The worst thing about text messaging is the lack of nuance. Who hasn’t accidentally upset someone because you meant a text to be read one way and they took it another? You can get some of the way there with emoji, but it’s still not the same. Was your smiley face sympathetic or sarcastic? Voice messaging has all the nuance you could want, short of having a sit down conversation. If you’re telling a joke, they can hear it in your voice. If you’re angry, they’ll know about it. It’s much much harder to end up in the doghouse because you’ve been misconstrued.
Voice messaging even has a couple of advantages over actual phone calls. Since it’s asynchronous, the other person doesn’t need to be available to pick up their phone; they can check your message and respond whenever they want. You also can’t be drawn into a long conversation or get interrupted.
Now, voice messages aren’t perfect. They have a few flaws that in some cases may be deal breakers. Voice messages obviously aren’t silent to send or receive (without headphones). If you’re in public people can overhear you. There are also times it will be socially unacceptable to start talking to your phone. Voice messages are harder to scan quickly and you can’t search them. This makes them less suitable for sending information like your address or a phone number.
On balance though, I think audio messages are a pretty clear winner. If you haven’t used them, you should try them out.

Most Expensive City in the World

This Is The Most Expensive City In The World To Live In

singapore
Getty Images

Can you guess it?

MELISSA LOCKER 

The Economist Intelligence Unit has just released its annual ranking of the world’s 10 most expensive cities. Taking into account 400 individual prices across 160 products and services in 133 cities, the survey found that for the third year in a row, Singapore is the most expensive city in the world.

It’s closely followed by banking capital Zurich and Hong Kong, which jumped up seven places in the ranking in the last twelve months. Geneva, Paris, London, New York, Copenhagen, Los Angeles, and Seoul round out the top ten.

In making its assessment, the Worldwide Cost of Living survey, which is released twice a year by the EIU, compares prices on everything from food and drink to clothing, household supplies, and personal-care items, home rents, transportation, utility bills, private schools, domestic help, and recreational costs. In total, more than 50,000 individual prices are collected in each survey.

The report notes that part of Singapore's run as the most expensive city is due to its high transport and utility costs, both of which can affect travelers as they can translate to higher hotel room fees and more expensive public transit. (Singapore’s transportation costs are 2.7 times higher than in New York!)

Singapore isn’t more expensive in every category, though. Travelling foodies eager to visit the city’s famed Epicurean Market will be pleased to note that basic groceries are cheaper in Singapore than in its Asian neighbors (Seoul is 33% more expensive at the grocery store).

While Asia has three of the most expensive cities in the world, India has four of the least expensive, including New Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore, and Chennai. The least expensive city on the 133-city survey is Lusaka, Zambia, meaning it might be time to start planning that safari.

World's 10 most expensive cities in which to live in 2016

1. Singapore

2. Zurich, Switzerland

2. Hong Kong

4. Geneva, Switzerland

5. Paris

6. London

7. New York

8. Copenhagen, Denmark

8. Seoul, South Korea

8. Los Angeles

World's 10 least expensive cities in which to live in 2016

124. Damascus, Syria

124. Caracas, Venezuela

126. New Delhi

127. Almaty, Kazakhstan

127. Algiers, Algeria

127. Chennai, India

127. Karachi, Pakistan

131. Mumbai, India

132. Bangalore, India

133. Lusaka, Zambia

Connect w/Fellow Passengers

How Can Cruise Ship Technology Help Us Connect With Fellow Passengers?


By Michael Yessis, Cruise Critic contributor
Sponsored by Carnival Corporation

Couple dancing on the sun deck, donning the Ocean Medallion

It can take some ingenuity for family, friends and folks-you-just-met-but-really-want-to-spend-more-time-with to effectively communicate and connect with each other during cruises on large, contemporary ships.

Those who don't spend every waking shipboard minute with their companions may have tried the Post-it note stuck on the cabin door approach, letting their friends know they've had a change of heart and are waiting for them at the Lido pool. Or tried walkie-talkies, lugging battery-operated handsets around the ship so they can talk to their rose-sipping spouse in Crooners Lounge while tanning on the Sun Deck (and letting everyone within a 15-foot radius eavesdrop on their revised dinner plans). Or the trick where they dictate a message on the cabin's voicemail, hoping their new friends will remember to dial in and hear the request to change the kids' playdate to 10:30 a.m.

So, passengers have certainly been persistent in their efforts to connect with each other. Creative, too. But has that communication been efficient? Effective? Empowering? Try frustrating and alienating. Or, as one passenger posted in the Cruise Critic forums, some on-ship communications can seem "prehistoric."

Poor communication -- and the suboptimal travel experience that can accompany it -- is a well-known problem among passengers and cruise lines. It's also one that perfectly aligns passengers and cruise executives. They both want the issue addressed and cruise lines are turning to new technologies for answers.

Family enjoying popcorn at Princess Cruises' Movies Under the Stars

Cruise Lines Make Progress

"What we see, not only with cruises but many places people travel, is a big transition between worlds that were traditionally 'technology off' to being technology-first environments," says Mark McSpadden, Vice President, Emerging Products & Technologies for Sabre, and a TEDx speaker on the future of travel. "So, what cruises are hoping to do through the use of technology is create better guest experiences and guest engagement throughout the whole cruise."

In recent years, in addition to attempting to beef up onboard Wi-Fi networks and other parts of their tech infrastructure, cruise lines have improved information flow and onboard communications by rolling out free mobile apps that passengers can download to their phones. Apps like Carnival's Hub and Norwegian's iConcierge digitize core ship information such as maps, daily activities and restaurant menus so it's always at passengers' fingertips, making planning easier. Perhaps more significant for the overall cruise experience, however, these apps also feature communications packages that enable passengers to text or call one another aboard the ship for a small fee. For instance, the cost of the chat option on Carnival's Hub: $5 for the trip's duration.

In theory, no more Post-its, walkie-talkies or voice mails. In their place, more on-ship connections, unbroken plans and delighted passengers. In short, a more human cruise experience.

In practice, the full story hasn't yet been written. McSpadden reports initial feedback around these apps has been positive. "[There's] excitement around having the technology be part of the experience instead of something you have to lock down and put away," he says. Reviews online have been mixed. Many passengers rave at being able to communicate using their smartphones. Others post on the Cruise Critic forums that they've been hindered by the hit-and-miss onboard connectivity. Some have concerns about Big Brother, wondering whether the cruise line will know when they're in the bathroom, or whether they'll know it's been an hour since they've ordered a drink and will send someone over to try encourage them to order another jalapeno martini. And another group actually wants to lock their phones away and have a tech-free vacation.

Cruise lines are studying this feedback and actual passenger usage will inform future iterations because tech developments on cruise ships are only in the early stages. Assuming passengers continue to adopt technology in sufficient numbers, cruise lines will continue taking the next steps to try to enhance passengers' trips even more.

What's the Next Wave?

Look for wearable technology, like Princess Cruises' Ocean Medallion to make a big wave. Debuting in November 2017 on Princess' Regal Princess, passengers will be able to wear this technology (or similar technologies) -- or just carry the quarter-sized objects in their pockets. The wearable interacts with sensors placed throughout a ship. The high-level goal: Provide a better, simpler, more-personalized travel experience. The technology aims to track passengers' movements and learn their preferences and habits, and then potentially anticipate their needs. In the process, it's possible that these technologies will also serve to bring people together and foster communities. Ocean Medallion Class cruises will, beginning in 2018, roll-out to other ships, such as Princess' Royal, Caribbean, Island, Golden, Crown and Ruby.

Consider if everyone wears the technology and opts-in to be "findable" on the cruise ship. On one level, it provides peace of mind to passengers knowing their kids are in the game lounge, just where they said they'd be. On another level, it could plant the seeds for serendipitous encounters. Say that a passenger is interested in wines, which she's revealed when she set up her technology. The technology could potentially alert her -- and all other people on the ship also interested in that activity -- to a wine-themed meetup, or just another nearby wine aficionado.

Other possibilities for technology to bring people together on cruises are just being dreamed up. "We've talked to at least one supplier about concepts of strengthening those serendipitous encounters," McSpadden says. "For example, oftentimes you'll meet another couple or another family, and you'll hit things off." The hope is technology can facilitate moving that kind of encounter from being serendipitous to being more structured.

The cruise lines aren't the only tech providers working to bring people together, either. The Cruise Critic forum's Roll Calls, for instance, have for years connected people on specific ships before sailings. With dozens or even hundreds of people in individual ship forums, Roll Calls are effective for coordinating initial onboard meetups and planning shore excursions, and for simply making basic social connections.

"It makes a difference," says Laura Sterling, Cruise Critic's Senior Manager of Community, aka the person who facilitates the Roll Calls. "A lot of times when you're on a ship, you tend to see people over and over again. So, you stop and you chat for a minute. It definitely adds to the overall sociality of the cruise by participating in a Roll Call. And listen, you don't have to make a best friend. You're not inviting them to Thanksgiving dinner. But a couple of minutes here and there makes all the difference in the world."

Couple jumping into a pool onboard Princess Cruises, wearing the waterproof Ocean Medallion bracelets

Using New Tech on Your Next Cruise

McSpadden has some suggestions when it comes to preparing for your next cruise. First, passengers should familiarize themselves with available onboard technology before they travel. Download apps or just learn the basics before embarkation, so the limitations and possibilities of the technology are better understood. Second, passengers shouldn't be surprised if it doesn't go 100 percent right. Onboard technology is still a work in progress.

Still, the upside is huge. "People think that introducing technology cuts off the humanity," says McSpadden, "when in actuality it has the opportunity to connect people in ways that they couldn't before."

Travel editor and writer Michael Yessis has contributed stories to Smithsonian magazine, USA Today, Aol Travel and other publications.

Record Set for Store Closings

2017 just set the all-time record for store closings

by Jackie Wattles   @jackiewattles

These retailers filed for bankruptcy this year

More store closings have been announced in 2017 than any other year on record.

Since January 1, retailers have announced plans to shutter more than 6,700 stores in the U.S., according to Fung Global Retail & Technology, a retail think tank.

That beats the previous all-time high of 6,163 store closings, which hit in 2008 amid the financial meltdown, according to Credit Suisse (CS).

Walgreens helped vault this year's tally to a new high when it said Wednesday that it plans to close about 600 locations.

The drug store chain recently struck a deal to purchase 1,932 Rite Aid stores, and a Walgreens (WBA) spokesperson said most of the shuttered stores will be Rite Aid locations within close proximity to existing stores.

Other chains that have announced big batches of store closings this year include Kmart, Sears, JCPenney, Ann Taylor, Gap, Banana Republic, Gymboree, Teavana, Michael Kors, Bebe, Perfumania, The Limited, and Staples.

At the heart of retail's woes is the rise of both online shopping and fast fashion. As e-commerce giants have gobbled up market share from some brick-and-mortar brands, cheaper outlets like H&M and Forever 21 have also threatened clothing brands' business models.

By and large, analysts expect this year's final total to be dismal. As many as 8,600 brick-and-mortar stores are expected to close this year, Credit Suisse said in an April research report.

If that projection is correct, that means America will lose more than 147 million square feet of retail space.

At least 300 retailers have filed for bankruptcy so far this year, according to figures released by BankruptcyData.com in June.